The values of each science and journalism, for example, might favour publication of a weak study with a conclusion that would cause a `scare’ among the pubic—as a result of publication and debate are elementary values to both. In distinction, medical values, which put a robust emphasis on `doing no harm’, might favour waiting till stronger proof emerged. Medical journals, which many think about to be as uninteresting as phone directories and twice as obscure, affect the lives of all people—and not all the time for the higher.
It can move medication forward, much less by providing a clear course of journey and more by way of highlighting the deficiencies of the current—and offering a hundred ideas on the way to do better. Why then are they despatched journals full of increasingly complicated science, most of which is dependent upon statistical strategies that they do not perceive?
It is now unimaginable to take this position in public, as there are an rising number of examples of fraud. In one phone name in December 2002 I had to tell the editor of the Lancet that I had compelling evidence that two major trials he had published had been fraudulent. Despite my … Read More